"3,000 Deaths in Iraq, Countless Tears at Home … Another Grim
Milestone for U.S." - Headlines, The New York Times, January 1,
2007,
Can there be any doubt that the reason we-will-rule-the-world terrorists
publicize their ghastly deeds is to demoralize their resisters? -- To terrify
them into submission? This is nothing new: Public flailing, stake-burnings,
disembowelments, mass-killings and the like have often served as lessons to
discourage resistance to the dictates of the powerful or the would-be powerful.
"We must get our message across to the masses of the nation and break
the media siege imposed on the jihad movement. This is an independent battle
that we must launch side by side with the military battle." - AYMAN AL-ZAWAHIRI-London,
2001
"Zawahiri advised Zarqawi to moderate his attacks on Iraqi Shiites
and to stop beheading hostages. "We are in a battle," Zawahiri
reminded him. "And more than half of this battle is taking place in the
battlefield of the media."-Annals of Terrorism: The Master Plan, by
Lawrence Wright, The New Yorker Magazine, September 11, 2006.
"Al Qaeda Increasingly Reliant on Media ", Headline, The
New York Times, September 30, 2006.
What is new is the astonishing eagerness of the media to ally themselves with
the terrorists' strategy. Is it really possible that our highly-educated media
elites at The New York Times (et al) don't know that their insatiable appetite
for death reports creates an increasing supply of deaths for them to report? Or,
can the editors explain how their reveling to a dirge of dispiriting front page
stories helps dissuade publicity hungry killers from sending more bodies home?
Surely, there is nothing wrong with reporting a battleground death - once. To
repeat the reports serves no purpose beyond giving their killer allies a
double-bang-for-their-buck. Yet, the Times chose to greet the New Year by
devoting half of its front page and six A-section pages to promoting terrorist
propaganda.
How fitting!
-Zorroaster